Is Patagonia Erasing Pattie Gonia?

Last updated:

Are you Patagonia or part of their legal representation and would like to take this site down? Click here.

What Did Patagonia File Against Pattie Gonia?

Pattie Gonia is Wyn Wiley — a queer outdoor entertainer, drag performer, and environmental activist based in Colorado. They have built a following of hundreds of thousands across social media by combining drag performance with backcountry outdoor adventure, collaborating with major outdoor brands, and advocating for LGBTQ+ inclusion in outdoor spaces. "Pattie Gonia" is not a corporate entity or a competing apparel brand. It is a performer's stage name.

On January 21, 2026, Patagonia, Inc. filed a federal lawsuit against Wyn Wiley d/b/a Pattie Gonia in the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington. The case is docketed as Case 2:26-cv-00586. The complaint asserts six causes of action: federal trademark infringement, federal trademark dilution, and two counts each of unfair competition under federal law and unfair competition under California state law.

The central claim is that the stage name "Pattie Gonia" is confusingly similar to Patagonia's registered trademark and therefore constitutes infringement. Patagonia's legal theory is that consumers encountering "Pattie Gonia" content will mistakenly believe it is affiliated with, endorsed by, or sponsored by Patagonia, Inc.

The complaint was preceded by a cease and desist email in February 2025 and a follow-up in March 2025. Pattie Gonia responded to the first communication and disputed Patagonia's characterization of their prior relationship. They did not respond to the March follow-up. In September 2025, Pattie Gonia filed a federal trademark application for the "Pattie Gonia" name, which appears to have accelerated Patagonia's decision to file suit.

Current Status of the Patagonia vs. Pattie Gonia Lawsuit

The case is assigned to the Western District of Washington federal court. The public docket is accessible via PACER. All developments will be reflected in the timeline below as they occur.

The 2022 Hydroflask Agreement: What Happened? (Full Timeline)

  1. 2022
    Three-Way Meeting & Hydroflask Collaboration

    Pattie Gonia and Patagonia participate in a three-way meeting (also involving Hydroflask) and enter into an informal email agreement. The agreement, as described in later communications, involved some understanding about the scope of Pattie Gonia's activities and branding. Patagonia would later argue this constituted a license with conditions; Pattie Gonia disputes this characterization.

  2. Sept 2024
    pattiegoniamerch.com Registered

    Pattie Gonia registers the domain pattiegoniamerch.com to sell branded merchandise. Patagonia later cites this in their complaint as evidence of trademark infringement and an expansion of commercial activity beyond what the 2022 agreement permitted.

  3. Feb 2025
    Patagonia Sends Cease and Desist

    Patagonia sends a cease and desist email to Pattie Gonia demanding they stop using the "Pattie Gonia" name commercially.

  4. Feb 2025
    Pattie Gonia Responds

    Pattie Gonia responds to the cease and desist and disputes Patagonia's characterization of both the name and the 2022 agreement.

  5. Mar 2025
    Patagonia Follow-Up, No Response

    Patagonia sends a follow-up communication. Pattie Gonia does not respond.

  6. Sept 2025
    Pattie Gonia Files Trademark Application

    Pattie Gonia files a federal trademark application with the USPTO for the "Pattie Gonia" name. This action appears to have prompted Patagonia to escalate from cease and desist to litigation.

  7. Jan 21, 2026
    Patagonia Files Federal Lawsuit

    Patagonia, Inc. files suit in the Western District of Washington. Case 2:26-cv-00586. Six claims. The complaint requests, among other relief, a permanent injunction barring Pattie Gonia from performing under their name.

  8. Ongoing
    Case Active — No Resolution

    As of , the lawsuit remains active. No settlement, dismissal, or court ruling has been reported.

What Is Patagonia Actually Asking The Court To Do?

Here is what Patagonia's lawyers filed in federal court, in their own words. This is the public court record — Case 2:26-cv-00586, Western District of Washington.

From the complaint — requested injunctive relief:

"A permanent injunction enjoining Defendant, and all persons acting in concert with Defendant, from… continuing to perform in any manner whatsoever under the Pattie Gonia name…"

The Six Claims

  1. Count I: Federal Trademark Infringement (15 U.S.C. § 1114)
  2. Count II: Federal Trademark Dilution (15 U.S.C. § 1125(c))
  3. Count III: Federal Unfair Competition / False Designation of Origin (15 U.S.C. § 1125(a))
  4. Count IV: Common Law Unfair Competition
  5. Count V: California Statutory Unfair Competition (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200)
  6. Count VI: California Statutory Trademark Dilution (Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 14247)

The Damages Ask

Patagonia's complaint requests statutory damages of $1 — one dollar — in actual damages. The complaint is not primarily about money. It is about the injunction: the court order that would require Pattie Gonia to stop performing under their name.